Dear 705,
I needed some time to consider the behavioural issues pointed out by Sophie and your reaction. I think that, if you aren't specifically ordered to report about your clothing, avoiding to mention skating shoes wouldn't be a lie by omission. After all, your supervisors have access to the list of your expenses: they can always ask why did you buy such shoes. Similarly, if your rules don't say that you have to report about your forum activity, you don't have to do it, but you shouldn't try to hide it by visiting other websites more often. On the contrary, make sure that you visit it in your free time, spending your days productively overall. As long as you fulfil your duties, it isn't a fault that you wish to connect with like-minded people, offer your advice and hear from them.
I believe it is a question of logic and personal integrity. You aren't a child, you are probably much older than I am. If you trust that your supervisors can direct your life better than you could, you have no reason to hide anything from them (or bother them with unnecessary questions). If you don't trust so, you shouldn't be in this program at all. And naturally, it is a good idea to discuss if there should be a punishment for lying in your custody conditions. Maybe they don't want to add a rule that will be subjective and difficult to enforce, but if you think it might improve your behaviour, of course go forth and ask for it.
Analysing how to make your program "more comprehensive"... Azureko's idea seems nice, although I'm not sure if it solves the problem that the supervisor needs to switch network configuration. I thought also about the microphone idea and I believe there is a partial solution. Namely, when you have a dinner with someone or attend a social meeting, you could be ordered to wear a microphone. Then you would use the recording yourself to prepare a transcript for your supervisors. You would also provide it with notes, showing where you think you said something inappropriate and need to do better in future. This idea would mean a lot of work for you, and unfortunate implications for your friends' privacy, but I think that your controllers could make such a decision if they deem it necessary.
Another idea: increased weekend security. If you have to stay at home from 6 pm Saturday to 6 am Monday, there could be additional measures in place. Shortening your response time, maybe even to 5 minutes. Making you wear some restraints. Obviously, only your supervisors can decide if such idea will actually be useful. Maybe it could make your life more organised and help you appreciate all your freedom?
I hope that you will like my humble pieces of suggestion. In any case, absolutely no pressure from me, I'm happy just to share my thoughts.
Dear Sophie,
Please don't be sorry. You offer a valuable, unique viewpoint and I believe we all see that you don't mean to embarass anyone.
I am impressed that you find my idea fair despite not liking it, it requires a lot of objectivity. And I think that 705 explained my reasoning about that even better than I did.
Sophie wrote:For drinks, only water and tea, coke or soda are very rarely allowed.
For food no more burger or pizza but salads, grills and lots of fresh vegetables that i like not many, you see nothing bad.
What I miss the most are sweets, chocolate and cakes, all those sweets that I stuffed myself with.
Would you like to tell us something more of your rules about eating? Can you use sugar, salt, spices, drink fruit juices? Do you eat with your educators, alone, on the floor? How many meals a day do you have? Are you sometimes denied food as punishment?
Dear Ingrid,
I understand your confusion very well. Some stories here are pretty extreme by general standards, even for this community. It is always good to put effort into checking if everything is done with good will of both sides and nobody is oppressed.
When everything works well, you could think of such arrangements as an ultimate form of freedom, being able to gift it willingly to another person: even transcending freedom. It is beautiful when you can trust someone more than yourself to make choices about your lifestyle, and your partner doesn't disappoint this trust. And your comparison to becoming a monk or nun is commonly used and can be quite good, just that you offer your freedom to someone really close to you, not to an abstract deity represented by your random superiors.
Naturally, I don't encourage you and Anja to jump into such relationship right now. Moving from occasional power exchange play to 24/7 is already a big jump (as a dominant, I tended to skip it quickly, with... varied results). Moving from immediate action safeword to longer programs of release ("non-consensual consent") is much bigger, often requiring years of experience to do it quite safely, contested by much of the community and outright illegal in many countries.
We all hope to hear much more from you. Have an open mind and stay safe!
Greetings to all of you,
the Turtle of Doom